Friday, December 19, 2008
Why We Are Not a $7,000 Per Capita Country Anymore
Simply because when that number was computed you needed 25 rupees to make a dollar. As today you would need about Rs7.50 more for a greenback that per capita number falls approximately to USD 5,385. Which illustrates an interesting point: as a nation we become poorer when our currency loses value. And it loses value because we don't do the right things and/or we do too many dumb things. Of course we should not read to much into statistics like averages because they don't tell us the whole story. Still, it will be a little while before it reappears in the speeches of our local cherry-pickers.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
6 comments:
It would be interesting to compute that for the first 100 days after the recent departure of Manou Bheenick from the BoM.
It's been 8 years already since this post was published? Holy cow! An update is in progress. But we've looked at what has happened after Manou left.
PPP-based per capita as published by knoema.com shows that Seychelles enjoy better standard of living. Anyways these data are only indicators that do capture some easily perceptive facts but ignore more subtle realities like damning inequalities. Though I wonder whether these are really subtle in Mauritius for anyone willing to take a non-manufactured look! You are absolutely right Manou has contributed largely to mitigate the otherwise sordid GDP expansion. Basant Roi is part of the agency including Forget, Sithanen, Oodiah and a few other infamous lads rewarded to twist and shout for their masters.
Better standard of living in Seychelles? With a higher inequality, 40% of population below poverty line... Well, a massive influx of petro-dollars to save all aspects of its economy as from 2008 must have certainly skewed its stats, eh?
La la land, this agency is so wicked that it even creates "men of the year". God, if you are there, help us!
GDP per capita is an average so it has the limitations of all averages. Still, it's a popular stat and it's interesting to note that even a limited yardstick is going down with the obsession of the entertainer-in-chief at the BOM. For more serious analysis we're much better off playing with the HBS data.
Post a Comment