Meet Something A Lot Better Than the Gini Coefficient

It’s called share of income growth. It looks at how the increase in GDP over a given period has been distributed among the different income groups. The clip below shows what happened after a most regressive policy was adopted. 

Riptir, Nuvo Palab Ramgoolam

Ramgoolam pan konvink buku dimun dernye sinq banane ki lin sanze apres sa siro zanana li ti gayne an 2014-la. Li pan tarde pu pas den staz kot li ti pe dir ki lin fer lerer a en lot kot li dir ki elekter pena lespri. An dot mo ki nu ban gopia. Kav li panse ki nu amnezik si parski lin reamen Sithanen, bug kin kas lekonomi, tuy sevings, ek fer en ta lezot kuyonad kuma stimilis pakeg ek depresye rupi. Li anvi tuy nu sistem electoral usi. Devet samem riptir Ramgoolam: kontinye kraz partu kuma ant 2005 ek 2014.

Sithanen trakase ek buku kitsoz i konpri inegalite. Be anu tiek en kut kin arive par gato nasyonal ban diferan klas menaz sak fwa ki li fin minis. 

Flat Tax Hands 750,000 Mauritians Their Worst Share of National Cake

This is something the Gini coefficient won’t be able tell you but the above chart will. So yes, the bottom 60% of Mauritian households have been made more vulnerable by the Sithanen flat tax in the first decade following its implementation creating record inequality at the same time. They had their best shares of the last twenty-five years a quarter of a century ago. Plus we need to remember that since 2006 we’ve been producing some of our smallest national cakes ever thanks in large part to the damage done by the same unsustainable tax structure. Which means 750,000 of us got our smallest share of the tiniest of cakes. Not exactly what you’d call resilience. More on this later.